How can we help save the Port Authority

12Started 2 months ago by Cullen                84 posts            Latest reply from StuInMcCandless               
  1. Cullen

    freewheeler


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    I know this is primarily a bike focused forum however I imagine there a plenty of Port Authority users here too. As many of you are aware the Port Authority is facing significant service cuts in light of reduced state funding. I'd like to solicit the Bike-Pgh community's support in advocating for the Port Authority. Along with my bicycle I depend on it for getting around Pittsburgh.

    Would anyone be interested in starting a letter writing campaign or some other form of advocacy?

    One of the questions I constantly ask myself is "Are we going to close 30-40% of the county's roads because of a funding crisis?" If not, why would we let the same thing happen to the Port Authority?

  2. Noah Mustion

    frequenter


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    Great. Can't wait for a fare hike. $2.00 is already ridiculous for what has been the worst public transit I've ever used.

  3. wojty

    freewheeler


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    All the good solutions to this problem are unpopular.

    All the popular (are there really any?) solutions are not good ones.

    I would be all for vehicles tolls to enter the golden triangle that directly finance PAT, and other similar, extreme measures. But from a practical standpoint, now that I-80 is out, there isn't much left but to voice which get cut and which do not…

  4. sprite

    freewheeler


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    I rely on Port Authority to make it possible for me to bike to work at all (I bring a folder on the T) so I'm in for some advocacy.

    Noah, how many cities have you used public transit in? I agree there are some cities that do it better but there are also some that are far worse/uselesser (including where I grew up) and would hate to see the burgh descend to that level.

  5. sloaps

    bossanova


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    I heard this morning on the news, that PAT is considering a $7.00 fare for the suburban zone - I think it's technically Zone 2 now that they've made their routing more "efficient."

    Makes sense, and is still a good deal. If you're commuting from that distance $14 round trip is still cheaper than driving and parking.

    People out there like "market forces" anyway... If it were laissez-faire, then the east busway and most of the urban routes would be about $1.00 fare, the T wouldn't exist and neither would Zone 2.

    UPDATE: In the P-G

  6. helen s

    frequenter


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    I agree with sprite. Ours may not be NYC or Boston, but I have been to midrange cities where it was pretty nonexistent. At least 'burghers have some options.

  7. heathrs9

    freewheeler


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    I'd really like to see some partnerships and "out-of-the-box" thinking from Port Authority. It is a shame and completely unnecessary to have Beaver County Transit, Westmoreland County Transit and the like clogging our teeny-tiny downtown streets. If there would only be some way to have either some form of transfer, or better dropping off stations for those commuters coming in from Allegheny County.

    Develop a transit station at the North Shore Connector. This would include bike racks and would serve as the drop-off point for all North Hill residents and beyond who would then ride the subway into downtown for free.

    Eliminate larger buses that run nearly empty on the weekend. Knowing there are not a lot of dollars to purchase a bunch of smaller and more gas-efficient vehicles, perhaps cutting and combining some of these weekend and off-hour routes that are less used could prove helpful.

    We all know that this cannot keep continuing the way it has been. There was close to a lockdown a year and a half ago and with no true benefits to the riders (drivers pay was locked in until 2012).

    Any of us who have lived and travelled extensively throughout the country can honestly say we have been on better transit for a lesser cost. Our routes have recently changed, with most of us simply having to call our routes by a different name. There appears to be much waste at Port Authority and am only hoping that as easily as funds could be diverted to the north shore project, that other monies from studies could be shifted to where it is needed most.

  8. Cullen

    freewheeler


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    I'd say that we have some pretty excellent transit here in Pittsburgh at least compared to many similarly sized cities in the US.

    Many of the solutions are in fact unpopular such as increased fares and higher taxes. The $7 long distance bus fare in fact seems pretty reasonable considering that more urban bus routes generate small operating surpluses (farebox revenue - operating cost).

    As far as using smaller vehicles, capital expenditures (i.e. bus purchase costs) are significantly funded through federal grants. So there's simply not much room for savings there. Operating costs for a bus are mainly tied to the operator's wage and to a lesser extent the fuel costs. So there is no opportunity for savings on wages and a small opporunity on fuel costs.

    Taxing vehicles coming into the golden triangle is possible, but it may be easier to simply tax the parking in that area. Since, how many vehicle go there without parking?

    I think we need to look at a combination of higher fares for the most unprofitable routes and other local revenue sources from within the county, i.e. higher taxes to pay to maintain the current level of service that we have.

  9. ejwme

    bossanova


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    I like taxing downtown parking, but an argument against it would be "hurting downtown business" since simply taxing the parking will not improve commuting options for the people who think they have to drive (can't bus/bike/walk/carpool). It's like putting bike racks on half the busses unpredictably - decoratively useless to plan your day.

    I just did the math on my commute, and it costs me $120/month for my fair share of a commute from Zone 2 to Zone 2 (Penn Hills to Hell [Cranberry]). If they raise the Zone 2 tix to $7, that eliminates busing from my budget ($280/mo) and would virtually force me to camp out on my grandmother's couch weekdays, or get a different job (anyone hiring engineers? I mean OTHER than my current employer?).

    Why not hike the vice taxes to help out mass transit? Gasoline. Tobacco. Liquor/booze. HFCs. MSG. Gambling. I mean more than we already do (lord knows we couldn't hike them high enough to affect people's behavior, enough studies have proven that). I have a friend who said gasoline would have to reach $7/gal before he'd think about making any changes in his vehicular habits (suburbanite like me, Jeep driving commuter and joy rider) - to me that means that $6.59 wouldn't be a problem at all, with $0.40 to spare :D

    Sometimes society as a whole behaves like a two year old. If we want dessert (living in/near a nice sized city with lots of amenities and jobs and opportunities to take advantage of), we have to eat our broccoli (pay for mass transit for all the people that make the city so nice and amenity/job/opportunity-full).

    I'm up for letter writting, door knocking, phone calling, emailing, and general nuisance-making. Squeaky wheels get grease, we need to make sure the pro-PAT contingent is more irritating than the "Don't tax me bro" contingent.

  10. bikefind

    frequenter


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    Operating costs for a bus are mainly tied to the operator's wage and to a lesser extent the fuel costs. So there is no opportunity for savings on wages

    This spurred a fantasy of a volunteer driver force. Get licensed (/whatever else) to drive and do a route every however often, maybe offer a benefit like a bus pass. Hey. I said it was a fantasy. But while I'm at it, imagine pgh buses driven by people from the bike pgh scene:0

    Other organizations that serve the public and struggle to make ends meet use volunteers (like the library)- I think the transit system should go for it. They could start by using volunteers to drive the routes forfeited by drivers (part of the new plan, the one that lives in my head) who've gotten complaints about bullying cyclists or otherwise putting people's lives in danger.

    Another big money saver might be to ditch that port authority police force (or whatever it's called) and let pittsburgh police (actually) go after their employees when they commit crimes. I bet there's a good bit of money being spent there that's not exactly serving the public. Maybe fit a citizen review board in there somewhere. Fill it with cyclists - that'd be fun.

  11. BradQ

    bossanova


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    There is more than enough bloat in the defense budget to pay for better public transit without raising taxes. This would require action at the Federal level, but while we're dreaming...

  12. lulu

    freewheeler


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    I may be pessimistic, but a 7$ bus fare sounds like a good way to drop by two (I just made up that number) the number of bus suburban commuters, so that in one year, they can just cut all suburbs roads.
    What keeps me optimistic in this pg paper is the following quote:
    "Even if he could "wave a magic wand" and cut driver pay by a dollar an hour, the savings -- $3 million -- would do little to erase the looming deficit, he said."
    So obviously, bus drivers are not going to make any effort in order to save money. Which shows that they are absolutely very confident they are keeping their job next year.
    Otherwise, I'd suggest port authority to cut by three or four the number of bus stops, i.e. keep the same number of routes, but don't make the bus stop every 100 feet. That's the main reason why I don't ride the bus anymore. Just make people walk and save some time. Oh, and just open the back door at every stop, when I arrived in Pittsburgh, I could hardly speak English, and apparently, whenever I screamed "open the back door", it sounded like "keep the back door close and go". And don't let people eat their smelly sandwich in the bus.
    All that is free.

  13. rsprake

    bossanova


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    The authority expects to spend $70 million on health care, $32 million of that for retirees, who outnumber active employees.

    What a sweetheart deal a union job is...

  14. Lenny

    frequenter


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    Just 1 more reason why it's so important to have bike lanes/bike trails that go from the city to the suburbs!! I'm just one of many who have to rely on public transportation when I go to work.Would Port Authority help bikers by letting us use their HOV lanes??Hell no,because it would take bike riders away from using a Port Authority bus.Port Authority is only out for themselves.I talked to the bus drivers and they tell me how wonderful they,(Port Authority), are by letting us put bikes on their racks.I respond that it's also to their benefit by getting more revenue,(bike riders),for PAT.

  15. Cullen

    freewheeler


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    @Bikefind

    They actually use volunteer drivers in the Netherlands on routes that are not economically viable. From what I've read they tend to be retired persons, etc.

    What does and does not constitute economically viable in the Netherlands is a different story though.

  16. ieverhart

    frequenter


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    Pittsburgh's transit system is quite good for a city of its size. I'd love to have various rail options but there are many places with excellent bus service that are quite affordable.

    I'm in favor of instituting all kinds of tolls and charges for bringing a car into downtown/Oakland/other congested areas. But I'm concerned that doing that may "drive" people further into the land of expressways and "free" parking. Where transit is harder to make work, and people would be less inclined to use it, decreasing support...

    My parents, just a few days ago, were coming home from Highland Park to Shadyside, and went to dinner in the Waterworks because my dad didn't want to deal with parking hassles in Squirrel Hill, even though it's much less out of the way.

    But to answer your question, yes, I'd join a letter-writing campaign.

  17. edmonds59

    bossanova


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    Does anyone know if the drivers are actually asked for input into improvements, or are they just expected to be dumb robot drivers? If anyone knows where the efficiencies are, I think it would be the drivers. Also tie their wage increases into increases into system income (union would never go for that, so, instead, they'll just lose jobs). Teach drivers a little about public relations, manners, basic stuff any waitress is expected to know.
    +1 for not having stops every 100 feet, that is just maddening for everyone.
    +1 on canning the private police force.
    Stop paying outside consultants to perform expensive analyses as to how to save money, save money by not hiring consultants! Apologies to anyone involved in consulting.

  18. AtLeastMyKidsLoveMe

    frequenter


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    Easy does it out there. PAT cries poor every few years to shake-down the state for more money. There is no dedicated funding stream for PAT, so they have to keep asking, and part of the game is getting in the papers and on TV and threatening $7 fares, and grandma can't get to the doctors.

    It's just extortion disguised as a charade meant to freak people out to start letter writing campaigns, etc. to pressure the state to pony-up.

    Of course it will go to the 11th-hour, so that at the end the Bland and Rendell can have a happy-happy photo op and news conference announcing they have "saved" public transit in Pittsburgh (and all of those juicy union bus driving jobs).

  19. Tabby

    frequenter


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    I understand your cynicism ALMKLM, but funding shortfalls are real and the one who gets the money is the one who makes the best (read: loudest) case to legislators. Now I'm not saying PAT is run efficiently...just that there are a slew of programs that have to beg for funding...non of the others are run real efficiently either for that matter.

  20. Ahlir

    freewheeler


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    The PAT fare hike proposals make complete sense if you consider the costs of operating many suburban routes.

    Full data are available (under "Route Evaluations") at http://www.portauthority.org/PAAC/CustomerInfo/RouteChanges/tabid/512/Default.aspx

    While you're at it, check out the overview of the Transit Development Plan, at http://www.portauthority.org/paac/portals/1/TDP/OverviewPresentation/index.html

    Basically, the people running transit know what they're doing and have what (to me) is an excellent plan going forward. What they need is the funding. The money is there, but it's locked into supporting the priorities of motor traffic. This is what has to change.

  21. cburch

    bossanova


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    same way we can keep the city from going bankrupt. get the damn unions to accept some real and realistic wage and benefit cuts. i'm all for organized labor, but at some point our locals became bloated self perpetuating monsters who were no longer ensuring the safety and fair treatment of their members but simply demanding more for the sake of more.

  22. BradQ

    bossanova


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    Wage cuts? Worker wages aren't the problem. Let's not keep depressing the middle and working class in this country.

  23. Ahlir

    freewheeler


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    Why is it that the first thing everyone thinks of is to screw the working class?

    Bus drivers are for the moist part conscientious and do a valuable job keeping the the transit system on the road (so to speak). This is something that we all benefit from. Unlike too many others they are fortunate to have a union that looks after their interests. This is not something to begrudge them.

    I mean really, let's focus on the main thing that's important for all of us: a rational transportation policy that balances the needs of all citizens.

  24. StuInMcCandless

    bossanova


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    Oh, so much to say, and so little time to act.

    I have been in the transit funding battle every year since 1992. I have been working the transit advocacy beat since 1991. I know this subject inside and out.

    Cut to the quick: The anti-transit nay-sayers are wrong; posters above who have it dead-on or pretty close: sprite, sloaps, helen s, Cullen, Tabby, Ahlir. Not that the rest don't have a couple of good ideas.

    In PA, we cannot tax gasoline to pay for transit. A 1945 Constitutional amendment made sure of that, back in the day when steel, oil, glass and rubber were the backbone of America, all produced within 100 miles of Pgh, all used in the manufacture and use of cars, and all transit was privately owned and tax-paying. The laws were tipped strongly against transit, putting them all out of business in 20 years, thus causing gov't take-over.

    *That* is why nearly every other state in the U.S. has cheaper transit than anywhere in PA.

    Port Authority is not mis-managed -- I know what goes on there and has gone on there for almost 20 years. They are simply being strangled by bad laws at the Harrisburg level. Having perhaps the strongest union in the country makes things a tad difficult at times, too.

    ACTC, of which I am currently VP (and by Wednesday night will likely be either VP or its president for the next 12 months) is right now kicking off a letter-writing campaign. I will get details up within 24 to 40 hours.

  25. Noah Mustion

    frequenter


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    Even old "only sign of life is a highway sign for Pixburg" Cleveland has better, and cheaper, public transit (I'm not lying).

  26. cburch

    bossanova


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    @ stu sounds like something that should be added to the constitutional convention all the candidates for governor said they were in favor of...

  27. ejwme

    bossanova


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    Stu, that just makes it sound like we need to rescind a constitutional amendment. When the laws of the land do not look after the people who live in the land, they must be changed. It's sad that an antiquated industries that have since (mostly) left the area have retained a strangle grip on our transportation policies from their local graves.

  28. spakbros

    frequenter


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    all of that would require politicians to actually perform in the office we "elected" them into. lolz

  29. heathrs9

    freewheeler


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    Article this morning in the Trib from the PA spokesman was disappointing "...but the problem isn't expenses, it's revenues."

    It might be both.

    @stu - would like to take part in any type of campaign. I, too, have professional experience in the transit arena and we need better long term solutions than say, a drink tax or a $1 million lease at the Heinz Building.

  30. sloaps

    bossanova


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    Even D.C.'s Metro revenues are down, and the Metro receives nearly 80% of their operating budget from user fees (50% for rail, 30% for bus, 5% for access).

    Let's not keep depressing the middle and working class in this country.

    Amen. Just because you don't have yours anymore doesn't mean everyone else should suffer with you... Companies have been dumping "fringe benefits" for the past three generations, only for the state and federal governments to pick up the slack. Want to get rid of "gubmint run" healthcare and food programs? Pay a living wage.

    Davis-Bacon needs revisited, because most of the jobs in this country aren't governed by it any more.

  31. Greasefoot

    frequenter


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    Let me introduce everyone to the white elephant in the room…The Port Authority has dug a $550 million dollar hole in the ground and they call it the North Shore Connector…80% of this project is Federally funded but the Port Authority does not have the remaining 20% needed to finish the project…

  32. johnwheffner

    freewheeler


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    Let's not forget the Wabash Tunnel either. They spent hundreds of millions in federal funds to build it, and now have to continue spending their operating budget indefinitely on maintenance. I recall hearing it works out to something like $10 per car *not counting the amortized capital costs*. And I'm not even allowed to ride my bike through it.

    Compare with the $10m Hot Metal ped bridge.

  33. StuInMcCandless

    bossanova


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    Hold off on discussing Wabash. (News afoot.)

    North Shore Connector, blame (former mayor) Tom Murphy for having the idea. Actually, I rather like the NSC, but that's a topic for another thread, too.

    I cannot emphasize enough that this is a STATE problem, not just local, and a TRANSPORTATION problem, not just transit.

  34. Lyle

    bossanova


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    Compare with the $10m Hot Metal ped bridge.

    Interesting idea. I wonder how long it will take to reach 1M ped/bik crossings to amortize that down to $10 / each.

  35. heathrs9

    freewheeler


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    We are looking to improve the Port Authority. It does not matter whether rates are raised or not. I can still drive, motorcycle, bicycle, etc. I can afford an increase, however ridiculous it may be.

    Port Authority has been part of the problem. I hardly think that all the decisions emanating from the Port Authority Board has been via politicians exclusively.

    This is a human problem. One that some people cannot afford to lose. They rely on transit and have no other means of getting around.

    But, to portray the Port Authority as an agency with its hands tied behind its back and gag in its mouth is waiving all culpability and essentially watering down the powers of both the Board and Bland.

    While I can appreciate activism and volunteering on various committees, I think what we are all trying to figure out is how can we get the Port Authority to turn the corner, so to speak.

    So, what can we do? We can look at various projects, studies and exactly what has been happening not only in government, but at the Port Authority as well. Gasoline tax is not the answer (even if the state were to revert an earlier decision), but that too may be for a later time and another forum.

    I think what we have here is passionate people who are frustrated at seeing what Pittsburgh can become, but not quite getting there. $7 fares will wreck some peoples budgets. I would love to simply say this is a result exclusively of the Port Authority's bad decisions or that of a politician, but you know what? They are all to blame. And those of us who are fortunate enough to have other options should be working on this to ensure our neighbors, families, and friends can get to work, to school, to the grocery store... all for a reasonable amount of money.

    We need to be vocal both at this forum and at public comment periods at the Port Authority, through their committees and the like. Let's focus on getting ideas out there rather than judging past comments as either being more right or correct.

    Where do we go from here?

  36. edmonds59

    bossanova


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    Eisenhower was able to get the Interstate highway system jump started by identifying it as a national security issue. Defense forces needed a way to efficiently move around the country in the event of an emergency event (no, I wasn't actually there).
    Now, oil consumption is a national security issue. We are apparently fighting 2 wars based on our "national interest" (oil). Public transit reduces oil consumption, thereby reducing our country's dependence on oil. Transit should be funded as a national security issue. Transit should be funded as a means to increase national productivity by reducing peoples time sitting on highways, millions of man/hours. All the transit systems in the country could be funded from a minor tap into the defense budget. So, who's going to launch that battle? Mr. O?

  37. Cullen

    freewheeler


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    I think the Port Authority really has done it's part to reduce costs. The TDP made significant changes and PAT reduced its costs by some $60 million. That's a very significant number.

    Now the question is how high can suburban fares be raised without everyone switching to their cars. Perhaps the city could increase it's parking tax in the golden triangle to equal the fare hike? Equally important is how much money will the County and State be able to provide.

    In some ways time is on our side. The Port Authority has to pass its budget shortly but the cuts won't actually take place until Jan 1. That means a doomsday budget may actually inspire some action among our politicians.

  38. wojty

    freewheeler


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    The concur over driving out business ( and more importantly residential) traffic from downtown is a valid one. I don't want to tangent the conversation too much, but merging the city and county is a possible solution as well ( not to mention that it would reduce redundancy and save money for hundreds of other departments too). But i don't want to harp on that when this is about transit.

    Stu, i had no idea about the no tax onn gas for transit thing. That is incredibly backwards, and really needs to be changed. I'll be writing wnd calling soon...

    I'm all for suburban fare hikes, but east happens when those businesses just move out of the city so transit or biking isn't even an option any longer?

  39. StuInMcCandless

    bossanova


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    I suppose I should post my testimony to the State House transportation hearing for Friday. I was still working on it when this thread materialized Monday night, and my input had to be in their hands by Tuesday noon. I put it up on the PAT blog, but it bears repeating here.

    Changing the Constitution is extremely difficult. It would be a lot easier to pass a new tax, and the leading contender is a Vehicle Miles Traveled tax. More details when I get them.

  40. asobi

    freewheeler


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    If you impose a VMT tax instead of increasing the gas tax (difficult though it may be) you will be punishing those who choose to drive fuel-efficient vehicles or ride motorcycles. Maybe I haven't read the details of your specific plan but every VMT tax plan I've heard sounds both incredibly intrusive and regressive in terms of punishing those who are trying to help.

  41. StuInMcCandless

    bossanova


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    == This is the testimony I sent in. ==

    Though there is much to say, I will be brief. I speak as a multi-modal (bus-bike-car) commuter. We are trying to find solutions to two funding problems, not one.

    Public transit cannot receive any funding from taxes on fuels or from license or registration fees, as per the Pennsylvania Constitution, Article VIII, Section 11A. Therein, however, lies the solution to highway and bridge funding. That is what those taxes are for.

    By my calculation, with roughly 8 million registered vehicles in PA and a $240 million annual need, the highway/bridge need could be met by raising the annual registration fee from $36 to $66. The GOP will simply have to eat its words on not raising taxes or fees, as there is no other responsible way to make up that much money. Maybe they can close roads and bridges, or maybe they can put PennDOT under the same scrutiny and squeezes that transit agencies have been subjected to for years, but I doubt it.

    Transit is a tougher nut to crack. One good thing that did come out of Act 44 was responding to the objections of anti-transit legislators by causing PAT and SEPTA and other transit agencies to reinvent their systems, to be more responsive, to clean up their act, so to speak. They did that. Now it's Harrisburg's turn. Just fund it properly, as we pro-transit people have been saying all along. My preference is through a Vehicle Miles Traveled tax. This is inherently fair and self-balancing, as the more vehicle-miles are traveled in any area, the more transit is needed in that area. I believe it is also within the constraints of Article VIII.

    In finding fixes to two problems, let's not try to fix three. Stop building new roads that we have to maintain! In particular, kill and keep killed any hope of funding the Mon-Fayette/Southern Beltway project. On the other hand, please do find the puny amounts of money for improvements to bicycle and pedestrian projects which would lessen our need for primarily car-only infrastructure.

    In closing, it is simply good public policy to turn away from a cars-first and cars-only mentality. Instead, adopt this approach:
    Fix it first, drive it last.

  42. Ahlir

    freewheeler


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    @wojty: Even with a $7 fare the bus is cheap. Let's do the math.

    For example, Downtown<->Monroeville is 14 miles, fuel and depreciation (at the $0.55/mi IRS guideline) will be $15.40/day, or $308/mo (20 working days). Let's assume you have a parking lease, at about $250/mo. Your total commuting cost is therefore about $558/mo.

    The bus, at $7/ride would cost you $280/mo. Cheap at ~twice the price! And you can take a nap, or read a book. (Maybe someday you'll even have free WiFi!)

    Note that reality is more complicated. What if you car-pool, even with just one other person? What if you have an odd schedule, or need to also be elsewhere during the day?
    And let's not gloss over the psychology: isn't that car trip "free"? After all you don't have to feed $7 into the dashboard each time you get in.

  43. sloaps

    bossanova


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    Maybe I haven't read the details of your specific plan but every VMT tax plan I've heard sounds both incredibly intrusive and regressive in terms of punishing those who are trying to help.

    an electric car is still another car on the road - THAT's regressive.

    The operator of a passenger vehicle traveling by any means of power on our congested, deteriorated and underfunded roads, tunnels and bridges must provide the necessary funds if the operator will continue to travel in their passenger vehicle.

    On the turnpike half of its toll revenue is from passenger vehicles (Class 1), and other half is from heavier vehicles (Class 2 through 9). Therein, is a fee for traveling a certain number of miles on the turnpike: A VMT, if you will.

    I proposed a tiered VMT, based on the 9 Classes of vehicles recognized by PennDOT, to Rep. Readshaw. Not sure yet if that dog is gonna hunt...

  44. Greasefoot

    frequenter


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    @stu -Hold off on discussing Wabash. (News afoot.)

    North Shore Connector, blame (former mayor) Tom Murphy for having the idea. Actually, I rather like the NSC, but that's a topic for another thread, too

    FYI. Tom Murphy had nothing to do with the Port Authority or this Allegheny County Project. It’s all on Dan Onorato…

    Like I said this is the big white elephant in the room. The port authority has a huge hole (pun intended) in the 2011 budget and the major capital expenditure is the proposed 2011 completion of the NSC.

  45. StuInMcCandless

    bossanova


    Login to Send PM
    Posted 2 months ago

    I just came from a meeting in which Claudia Allen, Port Authority's CFO, explained the proposed FY11 capital and operating budgets. Funding streams for NSC construction are accounted for.

    She herself said, "This is a funding problem, not a spending problem." Nearly every big expense is out of their control. Nor is it strictly PAT; SEPTA has its own issues, as do other PA transit systems. Nor is it just transit, as PennDOT cannot pay for road and bridge repairs.

    The big fare hikes that made headlines the last couple of days would only close about 3 of the 50 million they're short. But laying off 500 of its 2,700 employees would do it.

    And yes, it was Mayor Murphy who revived the NSC idea in 1997 after the Port Authority board scrapped the 1991 Spine Line proposal that would have built a subway from Downtown to Oakland. The spur north, ending at the then-new Science Center, was part of that original proposal.

Reply »

You must log in to post.